Pdf approach of the uk court in piercing corporate veil. Piercing the corporate veil or lifting the corporate veil is a legal decision to treat the rights or. The researcher tries to study about doctrine of lifting of c orporate veil, to study about law of piercing the veil to determine the reasons for judicial disregard of separate principle entity to analyse the various statutory provisions relating to lifting of corporate veil. Boghtbarthet, the governing law of companies in eu law, hp oxford 2012, at 57. Where companies are in relationship of holding and subsidiary companies. Recent developments in the corporate world, however, had made it difficult to anticipate when judicial interference will be exercised to lift or pierce the veil of incorporation as courts have exhibited equivocations in handling lifting the veil cases in the past. Instances where corporate veil has been pierced when a company has been used by a defendant to escape from contractual obligations. In that case the apex court laid down the principle that a company is a distinct legal person entirely different from the members of that company. Aug 12, 2012 the courts will break through the corporate shell and apply the principle of lifting or piercing the corporate veil. Panorama of corporate veil and allied cases by the.
Discuss the question requires an analysis of whether the parent company a. The corporate veil has been lifted by the courts to determine the enemy character of a company in time of war. T he elements of lifting up of corporate veil and grounds under which. Lifting of corporate veil of company under company law law. Lifting the veil of incorporation case study example topics. Common law countries usually uphold this principle of. Lifting of corporate veil under judicial interpretation. A descriptive study on the doctrine of lifting of corporate veil. This article aims to bring to light the interpretational issues concerning taxation cases visavis the aforesaid doctrine and to focus on interpretation of the indian courts over time. This is strictly not a case of lifting the corporate veil but one where for non compliance with certain provisions in the i. Veil of incorporation, judicial provisions, statutory provisions. Lifting of corporate veil in tort cases in pursuit of. An anatomy of the grounds of lifting the corporate veil.
The lifting of corporate veil doctrine in hong kong. Circumstances in which courts may lift the corporate veil. Pdf corporate personality and the doctrine of lifting the veil. Piercing the corporate veil is a common law remedy and it was relied on by the plaintiff in the case of hulse ruetter v godde. Doctrine of lifting the veil of incorporation adeleye, peace omotayo abstract the locus classicus case of salomon v. Oct 08, 2019 the court in such cases shall break through the corporate shell and apply the principle of what is known as piercing or lifting of the corporate veil. Malaysias legislature has seen fit to provide for many situation in the companies act 1965 that allow the courts in dealing with the lifting of the corporate veil. An important principle of seprate legal entity has been recognized in salomans case which means a company has its own legal personality, distinct. The act provides for certain cases in which the directors or members of the company may be held personally. An empirical, comparative and development perspective thomas k. Download pdf doc docx pdf with metadata docx with metadata xml. By lifting the corporate veil in maby cases the courts have passed orders against the directors of the. Pdf this paper discusses the principles of corporate personality. The courts justification for lifting or piercing the corporate veil in cases involving category i situations is to be found in the policy of the statute or the intention of the.
The researcher analysed a number of case law, legal articles and textbooks on piercing or lifting the corporate veil. Jun 12, 20 company law lifting of corporate veil with reference to leading case shagun singh 15. In such cases the courts will lift the corporate veil and investigate the activities of the company. Natal the dissertation is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of master of laws, by coursework, faculty of law, university of natal. In doing the same, the courts have evolved the concept of lifting or piercing the corporate veil.
Lifting of corporate veil under the companies act ipleaders. Lifting or piercing of corporate veil circumstances in. Lifting of corporate veil under the companies act, 20. Additionally, many of the situations where lifting the veil is at issue involve corporate insolvency, the insolvency act 1986 has some key veil lifting provisions. It may happen that the corporate personality of the company is used to commit frauds or improper or illegal acts like tax evasion. Lifting the corporate veil to expunge a registered trademark. While we deal with these provisions in detail in chapter 17, we brie. Lifting the veil of incorporation under common law. However, in exceptional cases, canadian courts have expressed a willingness to depart from the principle that a corporation enjoys a separate legal existence.
It contains a comprehensive survey of the corporate veil cases in hong kong. Usually a corporation is treated as a separate legal person, which is solely responsible for the debts it incurs and the sole beneficiary of the credit it is owed. The limited liability benefit attached to incorporation is an. Case laws pertaining to lifting up of corporate veil theory. Corporate veil zimbabwe legal information institute. Understanding the if and when of lifting the corporate veil. The conditions under which the courts may pierce through the corporate veil can be classified under the following two heads.
The doctrine of lifting of corporate veil the company ninja. In my view, the principle that the court may be justified in piercing the corporate veil if a companys separate legal personality is being abused for the purpose of some relevant wrongdoing is well established in. In what circumstances will the cayman courts lift the. Under statutory provisions under judicial interpretation 4.
Significantly, we find no piercing cases in which a court pierces the corporate veil solely be cause a corporation is undercapitalized. Under section 26 9, section 34 and section 35 of the companies act, it is a punishable offence to furnish untrue or false statements in prospectus of a company offering securities for sale. In the american tradition, it is referred to as lifting the veil of incorporation or the disregard by the courts of the companys corporate personal or separate existence from its shareholders. Lifting the corporate veil based on fraud exception the. Act, the liquidator is personally held liable for the tax obligations of the company in liquidation. Doc corporate law project on lifting of the corporate veil. To lift the corporate veil or look behind it, on the other hand, should mean to have regard to the shareholding in a company for some legal purpose. Jan 11, 2021 lifting of corporate veil piercing the corporate veil by a fiction of law, a company is seen as a distinct entity separated from its members, but in reality, it is an association of persons who in fact the beneficial owners of the company and its corporate property. Empirical study of 30 years of piercing the corporate veil in the age of the llc, 50 wake forest l. The separate legal of a corporate entity personally is viewed as a veil of incorporation, which prevents outsiders taking legal action against company members, even though the outsiders can ascertain the identities of those members and the number of shares that they hold. Lifting of corporate veil with reference to leading cases. For simplicity, this article will use piercing of the corporate veil to encompass both. Instance when the corporate veil can be lifted to allow an employee to execute court decrees for employment dues against the directors of the company which formerly employed him.
It may hold the stockholders personally liable for the firms obligations under the legal concept of lifting the corporate veil. Aug, 2019 the essay analyses and scrutinises under which circumstances the corporate veil can be disregarded in the uk. This paper provides an empirical, comparative, and development perspective on the corporate veil doctrine. The objective of this paper is to analyse the concept of lifting of veil on the ground of fraud while referring to its fundamental elements and secondly to examine whether there is an opportunity with the courts to lift the corporate veil and how courts have used this exception for cases before it. Oct 16, 2017 a few instances of lifting of the corporate veil cases are listed below.
Corporate personality and lifitng of the corporate veil. The authors shall also discuss its history and subsequent evolution and the various approaches in form of theories which the courts have adopted while deciding whether or not to pierce the corporate veil. The phrase piercing the corporate veil was described in a 1973 case as now fashionable. In company law, the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil has been well known. It constitutes the bedrock principle upon which company is regarded as an entity distinct from. In cases where the veil is lifted, the law either goes behind the corporate personality. The restrictions on lifting the veil, found in contractual cases made no difference. It entails disregarding the limited liability in a company to hold. Thus lifting of corporate veil refers to the possibility of looking behind the companys framework or behind the companys separate personality to make the members liable, as an. In such cases, the court will break through the corporate shell and apply the principle of lifting or piercing the corporate veil, ie. The case also addressed longstanding issues under the english conflict of laws as to when a company would be resident in a foreign jurisdiction such that the english courts would recognise the foreign courts jurisdiction over the company.
However, the courts have not always applied the separate legal entity principle as the salomon case. The fact, that the liability is of the company and not of the members, create a veil between the members and third party but sometimes to make the real culprit liable this corporate veil is pierced. Corporate veil lifting under companies act 20 what does it mean. The doctrine of lifting the corporate veil means ignoring the corporate nature of the body of individuals incorporated as a company. Although circumstances would often arise where it would be. Through invention in the statute, an organized corporation is adorned with a distinct identity. Lord sumption limited the doctrine to genuine exceptions to salomon. Corporate veil lifting under companies act 20 what does. In my view, the principle that the court may be justified in piercing the corporate veil if a companys separate legal personality is being abused for the purpose of some relevant wrongdoing is well established in the authorities. Veil lifting question the general reasoning of the court in this area of veil lifting the corporate veil has been confusing and, at times, contradictory. Thus, the concept of piercing or lifting the corporate veil holds significance. But in practice, it is a group of individuals who are, in a sense, the beneficial owners of the body corporate property. The resilience of the corporate veil was tested in the 2019 court of appeal case of rossendale borough council v hurstwood properties ltd 2019 ewca cov 364.
Salomon is the judicial authority that enforces the legal personality of corporate entity especially when it has been incorporated. To lift or not to lift the corporate veil the unfinished. Mar 27, 2020 veil piercing lifting in uk under fraud exception. Apr 07, 2021 considering that there is no standardized approach to determine when the corporate veil would be pierced, it is not free from the risk of judicial inconsistencies and courts may come to an incorrect result in some cases. Lifting the veil of incorporation under common law and. Jul 17, 2019 the piercing or lifting of a corporate veil is in the interest of justice. Swedish supreme court cases, legislative inquiries and doctrine will be part of the study and because of the uncertainty surrounding the topic, the study also.
To offer a full account of the exceptions to the corporate personality doctrine, this paper also examines cases where the veil of incorporation is lifted due to a. Lifting or piercing the corporate veil company law. Disadvantages of incorporation of company with explanations. Pulling back the curtains separate legal personality and.
Fraud or improper purpose the law will not facilitate fraud, so if a company has been used as a mask for a fraudulent action, the court may lift the corporate veil and make the members liable for the action made. A critical analysis of the piercing of the corporate veil in. Lifting of corporate veil of company under company law. The case focused on payments of business rates and the use of special purpose vehicle spv companies to avoid rate liability.
The court in the present case noted that it was not disputed that rajoos son anantha was the 50% shareholder and codirector in bumitulin, and the fact that rajoo was a former director of. When and how the corporate veil is to be lifted is a matter which would be required to be decided on the facts of each case. There is also a category of cases in which courts have been willing to lift the veil to further the. Introduction when carrying on business, seeking an appropriate corporate structure which accommodates to the needs of the intended business and lifting the corporate veil uk law.
To lift or not to lift the corporate veil the unfinished story. A critical analysis of common law principles in lifting the corporate veil. Cases and articles have been used to set out the main principles in which the law is based. Enterprise liability in india sharmishtha bharde symbiosis law school, pune abstract the lifting of the corporate veil is an exception to the norm of separating the company and its members in the eyes of law. This paper attempts to stream line the underlining principles adopted by common law, case law and statutes to pierce the veil of incorporation like where the. Sec 179 1 of the income tax act is the one provision which fit in well with the concept of a lifting the corporate. A clear understand ing of the doctrine of lifting up of corporate veil is necessary and also clear understanding of corporate personality is also necessary along with the provisions in indian companies act 20 and other provisions relating to lifting up of corporate veil.
A company is a juristic person, but in reality it is a group of person who are the beneficial owners of the property of the corporate body. In a number of circumstances, the court will pierce the corporate veil or will. Re bulge press ltd 1960 in this case, there were three shareholders, two majority shareholders jackson and shaw and a minority shareholder trebly jackson and shaw wanted. Piercing the corporate veil or lifting the corporate veil is a legal decision to treat the rights or duties of a corporation as the rights or liabilities of its shareholders. The lifting or piercing of the corporate veil is more or less a judicial act. Lifting the corporate veil in company law, the doctrine of. This flexibility extends, in the last resort, to the view which the. Lifting of the corporate veil for environmental degradation. Lifting the corporate veil provisions under the companies.
Footnote 49 the significance of this part of article 252b is that it looks behind the corporate veil of the host state subsidiary, for the purpose of determining the foreign nationality of the investor, without having to justify this under the limited domestic company law grounds for lifting the corporate veil. Where a shareholder has lost the privilege of limited liability and has become directly liable to certain creditors of the company on the ground that, with his knowledge, the company. If a director continues to trade after this point he will risk having to contribute to the debts of the company. Principle of lifting the corporate veil under company law. The defendants company and the defendants wife entered into a lease agreement solely for purposes of defeating the sale in execution that was imminent and so that they could remain in occupation of the property after the sale. Based on the analysis of the relevant legislative provisions and some court cases, it is found that ethiopian company law, though not sufficient. However in the case of inter export llc v townley 2019 ewca civ 2068 the court found that the corporate veil could be pierced so that directors could be personally liable for fraudulent misrepresentation. Adams v cape industries plc 1990 ch 433 is a uk company law case on separate legal personality and limited liability of shareholders. This is popularly known as lifting or piercing of corporate veil. Tjio, lifting the veil on piercing the veil, 19 lmclq 2014, at 20. The court will make the members or the controlling persons liable for debts and obligations of the company. The separate legal of a corporate entity personally is viewed as a veil of incorporation, which prevents outsiders taking legal action against company members, even though the outsiders can ascertain the identities of those members and.
1571 551 1549 424 45 149 1077 1728 524 807 746 295 881 1378 134 227 46 493 831 8 1366 714 1234 1251 804 45 446 206 97 1667 419 1216 1446 1244